SHORT DOCUMENTARY
1 Minute & 45 Seconds – Hidden in Plain Sight
Director Eye Witness
ABOUT the documentary
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phono-records. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of fair use. The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law. Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes The nature of the copyrighted work The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the authors observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported. Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.
When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney. FL-102, Revised May 2009
Act I
Act II
A Conversation with Sophia Stewart the Mother of The Matrix in 2009.
by Eye Witness TV
Segment 1 features:
- an in-depth look into the Third Eye
- Sophia’s inspiration to create the Third Eye
- The Second Coming of Christ.
- The Third Eye: Past, Present and Future
- “I’ll be back” – The Terminator/Matrix Connection
- Black Science Fiction
- The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions: Complications Not Duplications
- No High School to Pros
- A different Perspective: The Bible in 3D
- What was stolen?
- The One Ripped backwards
- I’m not here to turn atheists into believers
- Choice: The Red and Blue Pill
- God as Physical law
- Explanation of The One The Underlying Message to The Third Eye
- Sophia’s suggestion to solve the problem
- Where any part of the Third Eye left out the Matrix?
- People’s reaction to learning of The Sophia Stewart Case
- Is there a lack of creativity in Holly Wood?
Segment 2 features:
- A candid, forthright discussion about The Sophia Stewart Legal Case
May 1981 – - The Beginning of the deception
- F.B.I. – The Justice Department Gathers Evidence
- Settlement Negotiations Aborted Warner Brothers Whistle blowers
- Did others have knowledge of The Third Eye being used?